POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC AND OPEN LOBECTOMIES
https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2025_3_34
Abstract
The aim of the study: to conduct a comparative analysis of the frequency of postoperative complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries and open lobectomies.
Material and methods of the study. A retrospective analysis of 404 cases (276 video-assisted thoracoscopic and 128 open surgeries) was conducted at the Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary (2018– 2024). The incidence of pneumothorax, hemothorax, chylothorax, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism was assessed.
Results of the study and their discussion. The incidence of postoperative complications was comparable between the groups. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the analyzed parameters. At the same time, in the group of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries, there was a tendency towards a decrease in the incidence of chylothorax (0% versus 2,3% in the open surgery group, p = 0,056), hemothorax (0,7% versus 1,6%; OR 0,46, 95% CI 0,07–3,25) and systemic complications (myocardial infarction: 0,4% versus 1,6%; pulmonary embolism: 0,7% versus 1,6%). The incidence of pneumothorax was almost identical (6,2% versus 6,3%).
Conclusions. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy demonstrates a postoperative complication profile comparable to that of open surgery. The observed reduction in the incidence of certain complications supports the safety and potential advantages of this minimally invasive approach, supporting its widespread adoption in clinical practice.
About the Authors
V. V. KondratyevRussian Federation
Kondratyev V.V., Oncologist of the Thoracic Oncology Department, Assistant of the Oncology Department
3 Gorky st., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693010
2 Ostryakova ave., Vladivostok, 690002
V. I. Apanasevich
Russian Federation
Apanasevich V.I., Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor
2 Ostryakova ave., Vladivostok, Russia, 690002
S. S. Startsev
Russian Federation
Startsev S.S., Chief physician the Sakhalin Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Lecturer of the Department of Oncology
3 Gorky st., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693010
2 Ostryakova ave., Vladivostok, 690002
V. Shatokhin
Russian Federation
Shatokhin V.Y., Oncologist of the Thoracic Oncology Department
3 Gorky st., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693010
I. S. Usoltseva
Russian Federation
Usoltseva I.S., Oncologist at the DSPLT Department, Assistant at the Department of Oncology
3 Gorky st., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693010
2 Ostryakova ave., Vladivostok, 690002
A. B. Sunyaykin
Russian Federation
Sunyaykin A.B., Oncologist at the DSPLT Department, Assistant at the Department of Oncology
3 Gorky st., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693010
2 Ostryakova ave., Vladivostok, 690002
References
1. Jiang Y., Su Z., Liang H., et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopy for lung cancer. who is the future of thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2020. Aug. 12. 8. 4427–4433. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1116.
2. Nachira D., Congedo M.T., Tabacco D., et al. Surgical Effectiveness of Uniportal-VATS Lobectomy Compared to Open Surgery in Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Front Surg. 2022. Mar. 4. 9. 840070. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.840070.
3. Lim E., Harris R.A., McKeon H.E., et al. Impact of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy for lung cancer on recovery assessed using self-reported physical function. VIOLET RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022. Dec. 26. 48. 1–162. doi: 10.3310/THBQ1793.
4. Xu J., He T., Wu Y., et al. VATS Versus Open Lobectomy in Pathological T1 SCLC. A Multi-Center Retrospective Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2022. Mar. 23. 2. 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.007.
5. Gonzalez-Rivas D., Ng C., Rocco G., et al. Atlas of Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery. Singapore. Springer. 2019. p. 238. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2604-2.
6. Dai W., Dai Z., Wei X., et al. Early Patient-Reported Outcomes After Uniportal vs Multiportal Thoracoscopic Lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022. Oct. 114. 4. 1229–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.058.
7. Patel A.J., Bille A. Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery. Front Surg. 2024. Apr. 8. 11. 1389943. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1389943.
8. Londero F., Grossi W., Vecchiato M., et al. Fluorescence-Guided Identification of the Thoracic Duct by VATS for Treatment of Postoperative Chylothorax. A Short Case Series. Front Surg. 2022. May. 4. 9. 912351. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.912351.
9. Kent M.S., Hartwig M.G., Vallières E., et al. Pulmonary Open. Robotic. and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study. An Analysis of 5721 Cases. Ann Surg. 2023. Mar. 1. 277. 3. 528–533. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005115.
10. Spiezia L., Liew A., Campello E., et al. Thrombotic risk following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020. Apr. 30. 4. 573–581. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz321.
11. Chen W., Yu Z., Zhang Y., et al. Comparison of cost effectiveness between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats) and open lobectomy. a retrospective study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021. Aug. 28. 19. 1. 55. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00307-2.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kondratyev V.V., Apanasevich V.I., Startsev S.S., Shatokhin V., Usoltseva I.S., Sunyaykin A.B. POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC AND OPEN LOBECTOMIES. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2025;(3):34-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2025_3_34

        








