NON-IMMUNOGENIC STAPHYLOKINASE IN THE TREATMENT OF INTERMEDIATE–HIGH- RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM
https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2026_2_218
Abstract
Intermediate–high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is characterized by preserved systemic hemodynamics in the presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and elevated cardiac-specific biomarkers, which are associated with a risk of early clinical deterioration. The appropriateness of systemic thrombolytic therapy (TLT) in this patient population remains controversial, as it requires careful balancing of the potential reperfusion benefits against the risk of hemorrhagic complications. This review summarizes current evidence regarding anticoagulant therapy, systemic and catheter-directed reperfusion strategies, and discusses the potential role of non-immunogenic staphylokinase.
As a clinical illustration, we present a case of a patient with intermediate–high-risk PE who demonstrated clinical worsening despite anticoagulant therapy and was treated with systemic TLT using non-immunogenic staphylokinase, resulting in complete thrombus resolution, restoration of RV function, and absence of hemorrhagic complications. These findings highlight the need for further research to refine patient selection criteria and optimize treatment strategies.
About the Authors
B. S. ShaposhnikovRussian Federation
Boris Sergeevich Shaposhnikov, Assistant of the Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
310 Mira St., Stavropol, Russia, 355017;
2 Kolkhoznaya St., Izobilny, Stavropol Territory, Russia, 356146
A. N. Obedin
Russian Federation
Alexander Nikolaevich Obedin, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care with the course of additional professional education
310 Mira St., Stavropol, Russia, 355017
Yu. V. Bykov
Russian Federation
Yuri Vitalievich Bykov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care with a course of additional professional education
310 Mira St., Stavropol, Russia, 355017;
3 Semashko St., Stavropol, Russia, 355002
E. V. Ushmudin
Russian Federation
Evgeny Valentinovich Ushmudin, anesthesiologist-resuscitator of the intensive Therapy, Anesthesiology and intensive Care
2 Kolkhoznaya St., Izobilny, Stavropol Territory, Russia, 356146
M. A. Teterina
Russian Federation
Marina Alexandrovna Teterina, Assistant of the Department of Internal Medicine with a course in Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics named after Academician V.S. Moiseev
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia, 117198
I. Merai
Russian Federation
Imad Merai, Professor of the Department of Internal Medicine with a course in Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics named after Academician V.S. Moiseeva, Head of the Intensive Care Unit for Cardiac Patients at the V.V. Vinogradov University Clinical Hospital
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, Russia, 117198;
61 Vavilov St., building 1 Moscow, Russia, 117292
References
1. Konstantinides S.V., Meyer G., Becattini C. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020. 41. 543–603. DOI: 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHZ405.
2. de Wit K., D’Arsigny C.L., et al. Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2023. 21. 3016–3023. DOI: 10.1016/J.JTHA.2023.05.003.
3. Becattini C., Agnelli G., Lankeit M. et al. Contemporary Management and Clinical Course of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The COPE Study. Thromb Haemost. 2023. 123. 613–626. DOI: 10.1055/A-2031-3859.
4. El-Bouri W., Sanders A., Lip G.Y.H. et al. Predicting acute and long-term mortality in a cohort of pulmonary embolism patients using machine learning. Eur J Intern Med. 2023. 118. 42–48. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJIM.2023.07.012.
5. Humbert M., Kovacs G., Hoeper M.M. et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2022. 43. 3618–3731. DOI: 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHAC237.
6. Latsios G., Mantzouranis E., Kachrimanidis I. et al. Recent advances in risk stratification and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. World J Cardiol. 2025. 17. 104983. DOI: 10.4330/WJC.V17.I5.104983.
7. Mirambeaux R., León F., Bikdeli B. et al. Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism. TH Open. 2019. 3. e356–e363. DOI: 10.1055/S-0039-3400302.
8. Yuriditsky E., Zhang R.S., Ahuja T. et al. The latest in the management of pulmonary embolism. Breathe (Sheff). 2025. 2. 240100. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0100-2024.
9. Bikdeli B., Muriel A., Rodríguez C. et al. High-Sensitivity vs Conventional Troponin Cutoffs for Risk Stratification in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism. JAMA Cardiol. 2024. 9. 64–70. DOI: 10.1001/JAMACARDIO.2023.4356.
10. Weekes A.J., Fraga D.N., Belyshev V. et al. Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: echocardiography predictors of clinical deterioration. Crit Care. 2022. 26. 160. DOI: 10.1186/S13054-022-04067-8.
11. Zuin M., Rigatelli G., Bongarzoni A. et al. Mean arterial pressure predicts 48 h clinical deterioration in intermediate-high risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023. 12. 80–86. DOI: 10.1093/EHJACC/ZUAD014.
12. Zhao Y., Zhang S., Yang J. et al. Optimal initial duration of low molecular weight heparin lead-in before direct oral anticoagulants for short-term outcomes of hospitalized patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism. QJM. 2024. 117. 781–788. DOI: 10.1093/QJMED/HCAE083.
13. Stevens S.M., Woller S.C., Kreuziger L.B. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021. 160. E545–E608. DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEST.2021.07.055.
14. Zhang S., Xi L., Zhang Z. et al. Tenecteplase in pulmonary embolism patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Med. 2022. 9. 860565. DOI: 10.3389/FMED.2022.860565.
15. Mathew D., Seelam S., Bumrah K. et al. Systemic thrombolysis with newer thrombolytics vs anticoagulation in acute intermediate risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023. 23. 482. DOI: 10.1186/S12872-023-03528-W.
16. Rozenbaum Z. Revisiting Systemic Thrombolysis in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. JACC Adv. 2024. 3. 100923. DOI: 10.1016/J.JACADV.2024.100923.
17. Zhang R.S., Maqsood M.H., Sharp A.S.P. et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or systemic thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023. 16. 2644–2651. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCIN.2023.07.042.
18. Zimmermann L., Laufs U., Petros S. et al. Outcome after thrombolysis in patients with intermediate high- risk pulmonary embolism: a propensity score analysis. J Emerg Med. 2022. 62. 378–389. DOI: 10.1016/J.JEMERMED.2021.12.013.
19. Iannaccone M., Franchin L., Russo F. et al. Mortality across treatment strategies in intermediate-to-high risk pulmonary embolism in the modern era: A meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs. Int J Cardiol. 2023. 387:131127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131127.
20. Planer D., Yanko S., Matok I. et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2023. 195(24):E833–E843. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220960.
21. Pietrasik A., Gąsecka A., Szarpak Ł. et al. Catheter-Based Therapies Decrease Mortality in Patients With Intermediate and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence From Meta-Analysis of 65,589 Patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. 9:861307. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.861307.
22. Lauder L., Pérez Navarro P., Götzinger F. et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in intermediate- and high-risk acute pulmonary embolism: hemodynamic outcomes at three months. Respir Res. 2023. 24(1):257. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-023-02552-w.
23. Chandra V.M., Nacca N., Ross A. et al. Mechanical aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasc Med. 2022. 27(6):574–584. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X221124681.
24. Khandhar S., Jaber W., Bunte M.C. et al. Longer-Term Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: 6-Month FLASH Registry Results. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023. 2 (4): 101000. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101000.
25. Bruno E.S., Mujer M.T.P., Desai P.V. et al. A Meta-analysis of Standard Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023. 2 (1): 100514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100514.
26. Hobohm L., Farmakis I.T., Keller K. et al. Pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) implementation and its clinical value across countries: a scoping review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023. 112 (10): 1351–1361. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02077-0.
27. Fleitas Sosa D., Lehr A.L., Zhao H. et al. Impact of pulmonary embolism response teams on acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2022. 31 (165): 220023. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0023-2022.
28. Tereshchenko S.N., Yarovaya E.B., Leontyev S.G. et al. Non-immunogenic staphylokinase in patients with massive intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: protocol of a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled FORPE-2 study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025. 30 (2). 6291. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6291.
29. Kirienko A.I., Leontyev S.G., Yarovaya E.B. et al. Non-immunogenic staphylokinase as a thrombolytic drug in the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: results of the FORPE clinical study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024. 29 (11). 6157. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6157.
Review
For citations:
Shaposhnikov B.S., Obedin A.N., Bykov Yu.V., Ushmudin E.V., Teterina M.A., Merai I. NON-IMMUNOGENIC STAPHYLOKINASE IN THE TREATMENT OF INTERMEDIATE–HIGH- RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2026;(2):218-229. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2026_2_218
JATS XML









