EVALUATION OF THE NAVIGATION AND PATTERN-TECHNOLOGIES EFFICACY IN THE TREATMENT OF PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY
https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2024_3_1
Abstract
Purpose: to evaluate the structural changes of the retina after panretinal laser coagulation of the retina in single coagulate mode, pattern and navigation technologies with lasers of different wavelengths and exposures.
Materials and methods of research. A prospective study included two main stages, 78 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with the proliferative stage of diabetic retinopathy, who underwent panretinal laser coagulation (PRC). 4 groups of patients were formed. At the first stage, the quality of coagulate formation, structural changes in the surrounding retina and changes in light sensitivity before and after laser coagulation were evaluated. At the second stage, the efficacy of retinal laser coagulation was studied depending on the laser coagulation technology.
Optical coherence tomography RTVue XR Avanti (Optovue, USA), Canon was included in the diagnostic examination. The structural changes of the retina were evaluated before and after laser exposure. A study of the light sensitivity of the central parts of the retina was conducted using the Octopus 900 HAAG-STREIT perimeter (Switzerland). The severity of the pain syndrome at the time of the operation was assessed using a visual analog scale 30 minutes after the operation
Results. The formation of a full-fledged chorioretinal scar was observed with all types of laser exposure. It has been proven that a laser with a wavelength of 577 nm with an exposure of 20 ms has a minimal damaging effect, as evidenced by the absence of damage to the outer boundary membrane, outer segments of photoreceptors according to OCT data, as well as the absence of depression of average light sensitivity. According to the results of the pain perception study, it was found that patients who underwent coagulation on the Navilas 577s laser system in automatic mode (exposure of 20 msec) practically did not experience pain.
Conclusions. An assessment of the structural changes in the retina revealed the least damaging effect on the retinal tissue of laser coagulation with a wavelength of 577 nm with an exposure of 20 msec using pattern and navigation technologies, which allowed the photosensitivity of the peripheral parts of the retina to be maintained at the initial level. When using pattern and navigation technologies, the side effects of surgery (pain, glare,) are not pronounced, which makes panretinal laser coagulation comfortable and increases the patient's commitment to this type of treatment.
About the Authors
V. V. BukinaRussian Federation
MD, PhD, head of laser department
664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov str., 337
A. G. Shchuko
Russian Federation
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov str., 337
664049, Irkutsk, Yubileyny, 100
664003, Irkutsk, Krasnogo Vosstaniya str., 1
T. N. Yur'eva
Russian Federation
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov str., 337
664049, Irkutsk, Yubileyny, 100
664003, Irkutsk, Krasnogo Vosstaniya str., 1
A. V. Borisova
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov str., 337
D. Yu. Samsonov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD
664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov str., 337
References
1. Clinical recommendations “Algorithms of specialized medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus”. Мoscow. 2023.
2. González-Saldivar G., Rojas-Juárez S., Espinosa-Soto I., Sánchez-Ramos J. et al. Single-Spot Yellow Laser Versus Conventional Green Laser on Panretinal Photocoagulation: Patient Pain Scores and Preferences. Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2017. 48 (11). 902–905. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20171030-05.
3. Yau J.W.Y., et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012. 35 (3). 556-564. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909.
4. Al-Hussainy S. , Dodson P.M., Gibson J.M. Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times. Eye. 2008. 22 (1). 96-99. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703026.
5. Chhablani J., Sambhana S., Mathai A., Gupta V. et al. Clinical Efficacy of navigated panretinal photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015. 159 (5). 884–889. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.006.
6. L´Esperance F.A. Ophthalmic Lasers. Photocoagulation, Photoradiation and Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby. 1989. 1553.
7. Solomon S.D., Chew E., Duh E.J., et al. Diabetic retinopathy: a position statement by the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2017. 40 (3). 412−418. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2641.
8. Funatsu H., Berkowitz B.A.,Wilson C.A. The effect of argon vs diode laser photocoagulation on oxygenation of avascular retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. and Vis.Sci. 1997. 235 (3). 168–175. doi: 10.1007/BF00941724.
9. Tsuchida Y. Effect of photocoagulation on retinal mean circulation time of proliferative diabetic retinopathy by use of fluorescein video angiography and image analisis system. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991. 95 (6). 595–600.
10. Sivaprasad S., Prevost A.T., Vasconcelos J.C., et al. Clinical eficacy of intravitreal aflibircept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, noninferiority trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017. 389 (10085). 2193–2203. doi: 10.1016/S0140–6736(17)31193–5.
11. Inan U.U., Polat O., Inan S., Yigit S., Baysal Z. Comparison of pain scores between patients undergoing panretinalphotocoagulation using navigated or pattern scan laser systems. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. 2016. 79 (1). 15–18. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160006.
12. Muqit M.M., Gray J.C., Marcellino G.R. at al. Pain Responses of Pascal 20 ms multi-spot and 100 ms singlespot panretinal photocoagulation: Manchester Pascal Study, MAPASS report 2. British J Ophthalmology. 2010. 94 (11). 1493–1498. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.176677.
13. Muqit M.M. Pilot randomized clinical trial of Pascal Targeted Retinal versus variable fluence panretinal 20 ms laser in diabetic retinopathy: PETER PAN study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2013. 97 (2). 220–227. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302189.
14. Passos R.M., Belucio-Neto J., Xavier C.O., Novais E.A. et al. Comparison of 577-nm multispot and standard single-spot photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2019. 241 (4). 202–210. doi: 10.1159/000493280.
15. Salman A.G. Pascal laser versus conventional laser for treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2011. 25 (2). 175–179. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.01.006.
16. Shchuko A.G., Bukina V.V., Zlobina A.N., Yurieva T.N., Akulenko M.V., Borisova A.V. Structural and functional changes of the retina under the influence of different wavelengths in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2018. 1. 430–433. in Russian.
17. Borisova A.V., Shchuko A.G., Akulenko M.V., Bukina V.V. Assessment of structural and functional changes in the retina in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy using various laser technologies. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2016. 4. 26–28. in Russian.
18. Schuele G., Rumohr M., Huettmann G. RPE damage thresholds and mechanisms for laser exposure in the microsecond-to-millisecond time regimen. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005. 46: 714–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0136.
19. Shaimova V.A., Zarezina A.S., Shaimov T.B., Kravchenko T.G., Galin A.Yu., Shaimov R.B., Fomin A.V. Investigation of the effect on the retina of continuous laser radiation with a wavelength of 577 nm according to OCT. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2019. 1. 384–388.
20. Blumenkranz M.S., Yellachich D., Andersen D.E. Semiautomated patterned scanning laser for retinal photocoagulation. Retina. 2006. 26. 370–376. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200603000-00024.
Review
For citations:
Bukina V.V., Shchuko A.G., Yur'eva T.N., Borisova A.V., Samsonov D.Yu. EVALUATION OF THE NAVIGATION AND PATTERN-TECHNOLOGIES EFFICACY IN THE TREATMENT OF PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2024;(3):1-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2024_3_1