Invasive determination of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with chronic coronary heart disease
https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2023_4_119
Abstract
Abstract. This article presents data on methods of invasive detection of myocardial ischemia based on the assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. The scope of application of fractional flow reserve and instantaneous flow reserve according to the clinical guidelines is considered, limitations and difficulties of their use are given, the technique of their application is described. A clinical example of determining the instantaneous flow reserve in a patient with "borderline" coronary artery stenoses is presented.
About the Authors
D. P. IvanovRussian Federation
7 Kokhanskogo str., Chita, 672038
A. P. Fedorova
Russian Federation
39 А Gorky str., Chita, 672000
D. B. Nardin
Russian Federation
7 Kokhanskogo str., Chita, 672038
O. A. Durova
Russian Federation
7 Kokhanskogo str., Chita, 672038
39 А Gorky str., Chita, 672000
References
1. Bojcov S.A., Barbarash O.L., Vajsman D.Sh. et al. Clinical, morphological and statistical classification of coronary heart disease. Consensus of the Russian Society of Cardiology, Russian Society of Pathologists and Medical Statisticians. URL: https://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/Klass_IBS_2020.pdf. in Russian.
2. Knuuti J. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020.25(2):3757. in Russian.
3. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020. 25(11):4076. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4076. in Russian.
4. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019. 24(8):151-226. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-151-226. in Russian.
5. Bubnov D.S., Matchin Yu.G. Application of fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wavw-free ratio methods in the assessment of extended and multilevel lesions of coronary arteries. Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2021. 8(3). 245-55. doi: 10.24183/2409-4080-2021-8-3-245-255. in Russian.
6. Fogelson B., Tahir H., Livesay J., Baljepally R. Pathophysiological factors contributing to fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio discordance. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb. 23(2). 70. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2302070.
7. Gognieva D.G., Syrkin A.L., Vassilevski Yu.V. et al. Noninvasive Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve Using Mathematical Modeling of Coronary Flow. Kardiologiia. 2018. 58(12).85–92. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2018.12.10164. in Russian.
8. Corcoran D., Hennigan B., Berry C. Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017. 33. 961–974. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1159-2.
9. Maini R., Moscona J., Katigbak P. et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio as an alternative to fractional flow reserve in assessment of moderate coronary stenoses: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2018. 19. 613–620. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.014.
10. Darenskiy D.I., Gramovich V.V., Zharova E.A. et al. Comparison of Diagnostic Values of Instantaneous Wave- Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve With Noninvasive Methods for Evaluating Myocardial Ischemia in Assessment of the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease. Kardiologiia. 2017. 57(8). 11-19. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18087/cardio.2017.8.10012. in Russian.
11. Ermakov D.Yu. Invasive Methods For The Study Of Myocardial Ischemia In Interventional Cardiology. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2020.15(2).114-119. doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.83.29.020. in Russian.
12. Shukurov F. B., Baronets T. P., Rudenko B. A., Vasiliev D. K., Feshchenko D. A. Change in instantaneous wave-free ratio in the donor artery in multivessel coronary disease: a case report. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022. 27(8). 5090. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2022-5090. in Russian.
13. van de Hoef T.P., Lee J.M., Echavarria-Pinto M. et al. Non-hyperaemic coronary pressure measurements to guide coronary interventions. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Oct.17(10). 629-640. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0374-z.
14. Vranckx P., Cutlip D.E., McFadden E.P. et al. Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve measurements: recommendations for standardization, recording, and reporting as a core laboratory technique. Proposals for integration in clinical trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr. 5(2). 312-317. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968511.
15. Thomas S., Gokhale R., Boden W.E., Devereaux P.J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with medical therapy in stable angina pectoris. Can J Cardiol 2013. 29. 472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.07.010.
16. Botman K.J., Pijls N.H., Bech J.W. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Oct. 63(2). 184-191. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20175.
17. Mironov V. M., Merkulov E. V., Tereschenko A. S. et al. Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement For Decision Making In Multivessel And Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease. The Journal of Atherosclerosis and Dyslipidemias. 2014. 2(15). 7-22. in Russian.
Review
For citations:
Ivanov D.P., Fedorova A.P., Nardin D.B., Durova O.A. Invasive determination of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with chronic coronary heart disease. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2023;(4):119-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2023_4_119