Preview

Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin

Advanced search

Predictive value of systemic inflammatory markers in patients with severe ischemic stroke and multiple organ failure

https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2023_1_33

Abstract

   Multiple organ failure (MOF) in patients with severe ischemic stroke (IS) determines the severity of the clinical course and appear an unfavorable prognostic factor for the outcome of the disease. Changes in the concentration of inflammatory mediators in the blood serum, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP), may have a prognostic value in the outcome assessing.

   The aim of the research is to reveal the prognostic value of the inflammatory markers concentration in patients with severe IS and MOF.

   Materials and methods. A prospective observational study included 30 patients with severe IS. To determine and assess the severity of MOF, scales SAPS II, SOFA were used on the 1st and 5th days of hospitalization. A fatal outcome within 28 days from the onset of the disease was accepted as an unfavorable. The serum concentration of IL-6, IL-10, PCT and CRP was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on the 1st and 5th days of hospitalization.

   Results. In the group of patients with an unfavorable outcome, compared with surviving patients, on the 5th day of hospitalization, a higher concentration of IL-6 (p = 0.0136) and PCT (p = 0.0289), a greater increase in the concentration of IL-6 from the 1st to 5th day (p = 0.0136) were observed. According to the ROC-analysis, IL-6 has the highest prognostic ability: area under ROC curve (AUC) is 0,838, in optimal cut-off point value of 37,51 pg/ml sensitivity of predictor is 85,7 % and specificity is 73,3 %. PCT characterize by a good level of discrimination (AUC 0,80), IL-10 has middle prognostic ability (AUC 0,737).

   Conclusion. The concentration of markers of systemic inflammation and its dynamics in the acute period are a significant prognostic factor in the outcome of severe IS with the MOF.

About the Authors

V. I. Ershov
Orenburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

460000; 6 Sovetskaya st.; Orenburg



V. V. Silkin
Orenburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

460000; 6 Sovetskaya st.; Orenburg



V. A. Tsareva
Orenburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

460000; 6 Sovetskaya st.; Orenburg



T. V. Biryukova
Orenburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

460000; 6 Sovetskaya st.; Orenburg



References

1. Suslina Z.A., Piradov M.A., Domashenko M.A. Stroke: the review of the problem (15 years after). Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova.. 2014. 114(11). 5‑13. in Russian.

2. Wang J., Zhang J., Ye Y., Xu Q., Li Y., Feng S., Xiong X., Jian Z., Gu L. Peripheral Organ Injury After Stroke. Front. Immunol. 13:901209. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.901209

3. Smith M., Reddy U., Robba C., Sharma D., Citerio G. Acute ischaemic stroke: challenges for the intensivist. Intensive care medicine. 2019. 45(9). 1177-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05705-y

4. Nikitin A.S., Petrikov S.S., Burov S.A., Asratyan S.A. Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with massive ischemic stroke. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2015. 60(3). 39-43. in Russian.

5. Zadvornov A.A., Grigoriev E.V. Extracerebral manifestations of acute cerebral insuffciency in patients in critical condition. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2022. 7(3). 64-73. doi: 10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-3-64-73. in Russian.

6. Shatalov V.I., Schegolev A.V., Gritsay A.N., Afonchikov V.S. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2018. 15(1). 55-62. doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-1-55-62. in Russian.

7. Belkin A.A., Gromov V.S., Levit A.L., Malkova O.G., Shilko Yu.V., Chernyshev S.D., Ageev A.N. Cerebrocardial syndrome. Differential diagnosis and treatment. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya.2012. (4). 81-86. in Russian.

8. Popugaev K.A., Lubnin A.Yu. , Zabelin M.V., Samoylov A.S. Autonomic nervous system and its imbalance in neuro intensive care unit. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2016. 61(2). 137-142. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/avtonomnaya-nervnaya-sistema-i-ee-disbalans-v-neyroreanimatsii. in Russian.

9. Mrozek S., Gobin J., Constantin J.M., Fourcade O., Geeraerts T. Crosstalk between brain, lung and heart in critical care. Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine. 2020. 39(4). 519-530. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.06.016

10. Leontiev M.A., Vodova А.В., Kravchuk S.V. The value of neurohumoral regulation in the outcome of multiple organ failure syndrome in sepsis. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2020. 17(5). 80-86. DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2020-17-5-80-86. in Russian.

11. Gorbachev V.I., Bragina N.V. Blood-brain barrier from the point of view of anesthesiologist. Review. Part 2. Annals of Critical Care. 2020. 3. 46–55. doi: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-3-46-55. in Russian.

12. Kostenko V.A., Skorodumova E.A., Obrezan A.G., Alexandrov M.V., Cherny V.S., Fedorov A.N. Polyorganic dysfunction and systemic inflammation in acute decompensation of heart failure – mutual influence on clinical course and prognosis. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2015. 1(49). 54-57. in Russian.

13. Rudnov V.А., Kulabukhov V.V. Sepsis-3: updated main definitions, potential problems and next practical steps. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2016. 13(4). 4-11. doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2016-13-4-4-11. in Russian.

14. Kolosunin I.A., Rodin O.V., Kozlov S.A., Bazina K. A., Morozov M.V. Promising directions in the treatment of sepsis literature review. Ural Medical Journal. 2019. 12(180). 102-109. doi: 10.25694/URMJ.2019.12.21. in Russian.

15. Yarilin A.A. Immunology: textbook. Мoscow, Geotar-Media. Publ., 2010. 752 p. in Russian.

16. Immunology, 7<sup>th</sup> ed. Male D., Brostoff J., Roth D., Roitt I., ed. Mosby, 2006. 544 pp.

17. Chernykh E.R., Shevela E.Ya., Morozov S.A., Ostanin A.A. Immunopathogenetic aspects of ischemic stroke. Medical Immunology. 2018. 20(1). 19-34. doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-2018-1-19-34. in Russian.

18. Bonaventura A., Liberale L., Vecchié A., Casula M., Carbone F., Dallegri F., Montecucco F. Update on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Treatments in Ischemic Stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Nov 25. 17(12. 1967. doi: 10.3390/ijms17121967

19. Mukhamadeeva N.R., Kachemaeva O.V., Buzaev I.V., Galimova R.M., Yusupova I.I., Zagidullin Sh.Z., Zagidullin N.Sh. Serum Biomarkers for Brain Injury. Nervnye bolezni. 2022. 1. 3-11. doi: 10.24412/2226-0757-2022-12406. in Russian.

20. Evzelman M.A., Mityaeva E.V., Lashkhiia I.B., Kamchatnov P.R. Acute cerebral ischemia and inflammation. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry = Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2019. 119(12-2). 73-80. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201911912273. in Russian.

21. Gusev E.Yu. C-reactive protein: pathogenetic and diagnostic value. Ural Medical Journal.2014. 1(115). 113-121. in Russian.

22. Mudrov V.A. ROC curve analysis algorithm in biomedical research using SPSS software package. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2021. 1. 148-153. doi: 10.52485/19986173_2021_1_148. in Russian.

23. Marinović T., Bašić S., Romić D., Nevajda B., Đerek L., Maraković J., Raguž M. Dynamics of inflammatory factors expression in ischemic brain tissue injury. Neurol Int. 2019. 11(4). 8282. doi: 10.4081/ni.2019.8282

24. Sergeeva S.P., Savin А.А., Breslavich I.D., Litvitsky P.F., Arkhipov V.V. The level of interleukin-6 in acute ischemic stroke: effect on the rate of recovery in patients and on the severity of neurological defect. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018. 10(3). 29–35. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2018-3-29-35. in Russian.

25. Whiteley W., Jackson C., Lewis S., Lowe G., Rumley A., Sandercock P., Wardlaw J., Dennis M., Sudlow C. Inflammatory markers and poor outcome after stroke : a prospective cohort study and systematic review of interleukin-6. PLoS Med. 2009. 6(9). e1000145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000145

26. Park S.Y., Kim J., Kim O.J., Kim J.K., Song J., Shin D.A., Oh S.H. Predictive value of circulating interleukin-6 and heart-type fatty acid binding protein for three months clinical outcome in acute cerebral infarction: multiple blood markers profiling study. Crit Care. 2013. 17(2). R45. doi: 10.1186/cc12564

27. Worthmann H., Tryc A.B., Dirks M., Schuppner R., Brand K., Klawonn F., Lichtinghagen R., Weissenborn K. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein, interleukin-10, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein blood levels in acute ischemic stroke patients with post-stroke infection. J Neuroinflammation. 2015. 12. 13. doi: 10.1186/s12974-014-0231-2

28. Wang C., Gao L., Zhang Z.G., Li Y.Q., Yang Y.L., Chang T., Zheng L.L., Zhang X.Y., Man M.H., Li L.H. Procalcitonin Is a Stronger Predictor of Long-Term Functional Outcome and Mortality than High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Ischemic Stroke. Mol Neurobiol. 2016. 53(3). 1509-1517. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9112-7

29. Deng W.J., Shen R.L., Li M., Teng J.F. Relationship between procalcitonin serum levels and functional outcome in stroke patients. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015. 35(3). 355-361. doi: 10.1007/s10571-014-0131-0

30. Li Y.M., Liu X.Y. Serum levels of procalcitonin and high sensitivity C-reactive protein are associated with long-term mortality in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2015. 352(1-2). 68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.032

31. Sun W., Wang S., Nan S. The Prognostic Determinant of Interleukin-10 in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Analysis from the Perspective of Disease Management. Dis Markers. 2021. 2021. 6423244. doi: 10.1155/2021/6423244

32. Wunder C., Eichelbrönner O., Roewer N. Are IL-6, IL-10 and PCT plasma concentrations reliable for outcome prediction in severe sepsis? A comparison with APACHE III and SAPS II. Inflamm Res. 2004. 53(4). 158-163. doi: 10.1007/s00011-003-1239-3

33. Jones M., Hanison J., Apreutesei R. et al. Serum interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 responses in patients after major trauma: a prospective observational two centre study. Preprint (Version 2) available at Research Square. Accessed December 6, 2022. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1619278/v2

34. Shimazui T., Nakada T.A., Yazaki M., et al. Blood Interleukin-6 Levels Predict Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients. Shock. 2021. 55(6). 790-795. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001678

35. Picod A., Morisson L., de Roquetaillade C., et al. Systemic Inflammation Evaluated by Interleukin-6 or C-Reactive Protein in Critically Ill Patients: Results From the FROG-ICU Study. Front Immunol. 2022. 13. 868348. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.868348

36. Ishikawa S., Teshima Y., Otsubo H., et al. Risk prediction of biomarkers for early multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. BMC Emerg Med. 2021. 21(1). 132. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00534-z

37. Thao P.T.N., Tra T.T., Son N.T., Wada K. Reduction in the IL-6 level at 24 h after admission to the intensive care unit is a survival predictor for Vietnamese patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018. 18(1). 39. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0191-4


Review

For citations:


Ershov V.I., Silkin V.V., Tsareva V.A., Biryukova T.V. Predictive value of systemic inflammatory markers in patients with severe ischemic stroke and multiple organ failure. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2023;(1):33-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52485/19986173_2023_1_33

Views: 116


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-6173 (Online)